Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
April 26, 2011
Image Size
337 KB
Resolution
626×900
Mature Content
Yes
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
49,396 (10 today)
Favourites
1,060 (who?)
Comments
58

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
×
train Moscow-Kiev, Irene.
Three trips to different places, in different periods of time.. Three absolutely different women, and three tenderly emotional stories.. All these were united by an old compartment of railway carriage and my camera.
My albom "Railway novel".
Enjoy:)
[link]
MY BOOKS and eBooks [link]
Add a Comment:
 
:iconmysterphy:
mysterphy Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2013
I guess this is the real "Railway novel XVII", rather than the other one.
Reply
:iconkirnajnen:
Kirnajnen Featured By Owner Jan 24, 2012
Makes me want to be her!
Reply
:iconsaamsander:
saamsander Featured By Owner Dec 13, 2011
you have thirty eyes
Reply
:iconkevinroberts:
kevinroberts Featured By Owner Oct 27, 2011  Professional Photographer
hmmmm, I don't think I can agree with Naki, who has been permanently banned I notice.

The expression is subtle, but remember even 'lifelessness' conveys something very important, though I think I would describe this more as helpless or forlorn, and slightly lascivious. The lighting is very good, and the entire image gives the feeling of a small, somewhat cramped compartment on a railway trip. Nice way to while away the hours ;D
Reply
:iconazizjon:
azizjon Featured By Owner Sep 2, 2011   General Artist
Perfect shot!
Reply
:iconoblivious-naki:
Oblivious-Naki Featured By Owner Jul 29, 2011
Kind of boring... don't you think? Not much... life? Is that the word?

It doesn't make me feel... the lighting again is not so good... but the model is beautiful.

It really isn't your best... really isn't...
Reply
:iconrey13:
Rey13 Featured By Owner Jul 16, 2011  Professional Digital Artist
Great photo!
Reply
:iconergot:
ergot Featured By Owner Jun 24, 2011  Professional Filmographer
This is an outstanding shot. At first I was thinking that were the right leg laying down it would have been given more focus to the upper right areas where the face and hair are, however, it could also serve to point in that direction depending on how it's interpreted.

Very fine piece of work and not 'porn' in any sense of the word.
Reply
:iconchaoticmind:
chaoticmind Featured By Owner Jun 20, 2011
just beautiful :)
Reply
:iconleanlester:
LeanLester Featured By Owner Jun 20, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
absolutely stunning
Reply
:iconphotoscot:
photoscot Featured By Owner Jun 3, 2011
Marvelous!
Reply
:icontontohoman:
tontohoman Featured By Owner May 26, 2011
Ashtonishing beauty and perfectly framed.
Reply
:iconthepixelbar:
ThePixelBar Featured By Owner May 23, 2011
There's a lot of nudes on this site that are nothing more than an undressed individual. But this image really tells a story, especially pared its color tones.
Keep up the great work.
Reply
:iconwest-kis:
west-kis Featured By Owner May 20, 2011
Замечательно!
Reply
:iconculturedropout:
Culturedropout Featured By Owner May 1, 2011
*sigh* Beautiful. :-)
Reply
:iconnejo233:
nejo233 Featured By Owner Apr 29, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
simply mind blowing...luv it :)
Reply
:iconvalna77:
Valna77 Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2011
the name described her beauty.
Reply
:iconaerozopher:
Aerozopher Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2011
very authentic - nice
Reply
:iconphotobyth:
photobyth Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2011
I like it...nice capture of a moment in time..on a train. Those all bent out of shape over the composure obviously have never ridden in a sleep car (make a jail cell seem roomy). Focus is on the models face, not her crotch. Incoming light from the window, model's pose, intimacy of the moment. I like it...guess that makes me a perv.
Reply
:icongaeti:
gaeti Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2011   Photographer
I like all your series of Railway :)
Reply
:iconjacktheabyssinian:
jacktheabyssinian Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
The series is atmospheric. This picture has an evocative tale. If the Hollywood Hayes/Breen Code of 1934 didn't take effect, this would have been a still from a 1938 movie. Thank you!
Reply
:iconjazzhead:
Jazzhead Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
You have captured a moment in a space and time only experenced by lovers.. A vision that happen and is gone in a split second. Beautiful just beautiful.
Reply
:iconmarkroutt:
markroutt Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
a very beautiful image pavel
Reply
:iconpinot1881:
Pinot1881 Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
Oops, not below...wrong order. I guess the first one.
Reply
:iconpinot1881:
Pinot1881 Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
Gorgeous indeed. Agree with post below - spot on.
Reply
:iconironicgiant:
ironicgiant Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
Magnificent
Reply
:iconsasarixzexion:
SasarixZexion Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
This is not the best I have seen. The body figure is good yes.... But in this pose absolutly not a good idea. Because of her body figure this pose does not look good with her, she looks to boney, her hips are to produced out making it look more jagged than smooth and her ribs... I am sorry I just do not think she is fit for this posture, she is a very beautiful woman and she no doubts knows that but she does not have the right amount of curves for this.
Reply
:iconphotoport:
photoport Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011  Professional Photographer
I do not take pictures of beautiful girls. I photograph people's souls:)
Reply
:iconalmightysponge:
AlmightySponge Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
Judging by the way the camera is positioned and the way the model's legs are spread I'd say your intention was not on photographing her 'soul'. I have nothing against the nude figure, but why the 'between the legs' shot? Come on, man. It couldn't be any less obvious that this is comparable to the pictures you'd find in a nudie magazine. I'm not trying to be an ass, but if you're interested in her soul try the eyes or the face, or the hands. Really. Anything but her crotch. -w-

And before you say it, no, I did not go looking for this picture just so I could complain about it. It was on the front page taking up a slot which could've been put to a more 'soulful' piece of artwork.
Reply
:iconsabamenides:
Sabamenides Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
Normally, I would stay far away from the heated debates such a photograph is bound to generate. However, consider this:

Unless you have lived the life of every person on this planet, you shouldn't be so quick to judge what makes the 'soul' of a person, or how can it be made manifest. Sex and sensuality are an indelible part of humanity: without them we would be extinct. Knowing how humans are so different from each other, it's not hard for me to imagine someone making sex and sensuality the very purpose of their living, in the same way that it's not hard for me to imagine that someone would object to it.

I would also like to point out that her crotch, even being so close to the camera, is hardly the main subject of the picture (unless you want it to be so), as it's half in shadows, left in the lower left corner of the picture, and so blurred that you would never be able to tell what it is if the rest of the woman wasn't visible. To me, it seems like the photographer intended her right leg to be an important part of the photograph's composition. Besides, the fact that the crotch is so exposed is part of the erotic meaning of her pose.

Personally, I find this photograph rather tasteful, especially when compared with the extreme-detail close-ups of butts and vaginas you can find laying around, in which not even the face of the model is visible.
Reply
:iconalmightysponge:
AlmightySponge Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
The camera is clearly positioned between her legs and she's spread-eagled. you can say whatever you like but that's just how the photo is taken. I am sick and tired of seeing crotch-shots on the front page and having them labelled as 'artistic nude'. Like, if you have some incredible idea for bodypainting or costuming or a real unique shot, then why not? But this is not unique. It is a god damn crotch and titties. I'm not trying to be an asshole, here, but this is not a porn site. There is absolutely nothing interesting about this shot. Those who put a lot of hard work and effort into their art deserve to be on the front page, not those who snap a shot of their friend with her legs spread.

You say your sick of the 'close-ups of butts and vaginas'? Well this is one of them. Just because it's effing monochrome and slightly off-center changes nothing. This is a sad display, is what it is.
Reply
:iconsabamenides:
Sabamenides Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2011
Well, seems the only problem here is that you fail to see the distinction between a pure crotch shot and this photograph. If you decide a lion and a cat are the same just because they are both felines, it's your choice, and I can't help you with that. My original intention was to clarify and broaden your sights a bit; since you refuse, this argument is pointless.
Reply
:iconjohanv:
JohanV Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
If you can't see the difference between this shot and the "crotch" shots that disgrace DA, you need glasses, or an education.
Reply
:iconjecbro:
JecBro Featured By Owner May 9, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
u are an idiot man just an idiot
Reply
:iconalmightysponge:
AlmightySponge Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2011
This shot, and the ones you speak of are one and the same. Oh, and I have both. :)
Reply
:iconjecbro:
JecBro Featured By Owner May 9, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
by ur quote on ur messages u obviously are into sex and crotch shots, so whats ur problem.
And this picture is true artistic Photography, some thing u obviously don't know any thing about. so shut the F up u idiot.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconsasarixzexion:
SasarixZexion Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
I understand, I am sorry that I did not fully understand
Reply
:iconempire539:
empire539 Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Wow, mindbending shot!
Reply
:iconfotomartinez:
fotomartinez Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
I like it :)
Reply
:iconzancoti:
Zancoti Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
*saves to porn folder*
Reply
:iconphotoport:
photoport Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011  Professional Photographer
difference in interpretation. I'm convinced that porn is as [link] # / d2wv3b9
I think that the Creator would agree with me
Reply
:iconparanoia61193:
ParaNoia61193 Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
*the link is wrong -ahem ahem-*
It links to Zancoti's DA ....
Reply
:iconhelkathon:
Helkathon Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
Same setting, almost same pose.

Don't you get tired?
Reply
:iconphotoport:
photoport Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011  Professional Photographer
вы просто не любите и не чувствуете людей. Мне, например, давно скучно снимать такое. [link]
Уже лет тридцать:)
Reply
:iconhelkathon:
Helkathon Featured By Owner Apr 27, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
To be exact - yes, I'm quite nihilist, but that is not so important here, because I would ask the absolutely the same if it would be flowers or cones, or toy machines instead of the people - over and over again, in the same setting. The thing which disturbs me is the relapse, not the object.

And I did not mean to offend you. I'm sorry, if I did.
Reply
:iconbrunomaric:
brunomaric Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
Wow.
Reply
:iconnumptymcpillock:
NumptyMcPillock Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
irresistably erotic
Reply
:iconmic-ardant:
mic-ardant Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011
Sublime !
mic
Reply
:iconbear48:
bear48 Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2011  Professional
so very sweet
Reply
Add a Comment: